Unexplained Injuries in Custody
The Jail Called and Said My Son Fell. I Don't Believe Them. What Now?
Watch the one-minute version
The call lasted ninety seconds. He fell. He is fine. He was seen by medical. Then the line went dead and you were holding a phone at ten at night with a sentence that does not fit your son.
You are not being unreasonable. You were handed a conclusion with no facts attached to it. And here is the useful thing about the word fell: if it is true, it leaves a paper trail. If it is not, the trail is thin or missing, and that absence is the most important thing you learn this week.
What a real fall leaves behind
A genuine fall generates documents, because facilities must write things down. Ask for these by name, in writing, with the date and the housing unit:
- the incident report, with the time and the staff who responded;
- the medical encounter note from the examination they told you about;
- any use-of-force report, or report of a cell entry or restraint that day;
- the housing and movement log, which shows where he actually was;
- any photographs of his injuries, and a request that they be kept;
- the video for that location and time window, and which officers wore body cameras.
You are not accusing anyone by asking. A facility that cannot produce a single document supporting its own explanation has told you something, even if it never means to.
The two questions the law actually asks
Families expect one question: fall or beating. The law asks two, and they are proved differently.
If force was used on him. For a person already serving a sentence, the question is "whether force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm." Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992). And do not let anyone wave you off because the injuries were not catastrophic: the Court said "the absence of serious injury is therefore relevant to the Eighth Amendment inquiry, but does not end it." For someone still awaiting trial, the Court held that "a pretrial detainee must show only that the force purposely or knowingly used against him was objectively unreasonable." Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389 (2015). So pin down one fact first: is he convicted, or is he waiting?
If he was hurt and then left alone. The Supreme Court held in 1976 that deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious medical needs violates the Eighth Amendment, and that it counts whether it came from the medical staff or from officers who delayed his access to care or interfered with treatment he had already been prescribed. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104-05 (1976). Here is the hard part. Poor care, a wrong diagnosis, even real negligence is not automatically a constitutional violation. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105-06. Something more than a mistake has to be shown.
Nobody has to produce a confession
Every family hits the same wall: how could I prove what a sergeant knew? You do not have to. In Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994), the Court said "a factfinder may conclude that a prison official knew of a substantial risk from the very fact that the risk was obvious." 511 U.S. at 842. A risk that was "longstanding, pervasive, well-documented, or expressly noted by prison officials in the past" is exactly the kind a court may find they knew about.
Read that as an instruction, not a lecture. Every dated thing you put in writing is one more fact that was obvious. A phone call nobody logged is not.
The video has a clock on it. The paper does not
Most of what you want will still exist in a year. The footage very likely will not. Jail camera systems commonly record over themselves on a cycle that varies from facility to facility: sometimes weeks, sometimes less. Assume nothing and write today. A dated request to preserve matters for a reason beyond politeness. As the Fourth Circuit put it in Silvestri v. General Motors Corp., 271 F.3d 583 (4th Cir. 2001), "the duty to preserve material evidence arises not only during litigation but also extends to that period before the litigation when a party reasonably should know that the evidence may be relevant to anticipated litigation." Your letter is what makes that knowledge hard to deny later.
Know the limit too. Where electronic evidence is lost, the severe sanctions come "only upon finding that the party acted with the intent to deprive another party of the information's use in the litigation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e)(2). Short of that a court may order "measures no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e)(1). A high bar, which is exactly why a dated notice from you, sent early, is worth so much. How to get the video held before it is written over walks through it, and what to do when the jail says there is no video covers the next conversation.
Two walls nobody warns you about
The grievance chain is not optional paperwork. Federal law bars the lawsuit until the available administrative remedies are finished. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The Supreme Court set the limit of that in one sentence: "An inmate, that is, must exhaust available remedies, but need not exhaust unavailable ones." Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632 (2016). In most systems he has to sign and file it himself, even if you draft it for him. How a grievance actually gets filed has the mechanics.
Fear and humiliation alone are not enough. For emotional injury alone, federal law requires a prior showing of physical injury or of a sexual act. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e). Which is why documenting the physical injury in the first days matters so much.
What to do today, and this week
- Today, in writing: ask what happened. Date, time, housing unit; who responded, who examined him, what the written explanation is. Send it to the jail administrator, and to the sheriff if it is a county jail, by certified mail. Keep your copy.
- Today, in writing: ask them to preserve. List the video, body-camera footage, photographs, logs and reports, with the date and time window. A refusal in writing is worth as much as agreement.
- Today: write down what you already know, and keep doing it. What the caller said and their name, the exact time, what he said in his words, what you saw. On any visit, look at his hands, knuckles, forearms and the back of his head and record it the same day. Memory gets argued with. A dated page does not.
- This week: start the medical records. How to get medical records from a jail or prison sets out who to write to and what to include, and our records requests page keeps the letters in one place. If he is in a federal facility you can send it yourself as his authorized representative, on his written authorization "dated within three (3) months of the date of the request letter." 28 C.F.R. § 513.63.
- This week: ask him to file his own written request and keep his copy. Whatever the form is called where he is, the paper he files himself is the document that counts later.
None of this requires hiring anybody. It requires asking narrow questions in writing, sending them so a record exists, and not stopping when the first person says they cannot discuss it.
The First 72 Hours
We put the whole checklist in one place: the preservation letter you can copy, the records request, what to write down, and the order to do it in. It is free and it comes by email, so you have it on your phone when you are standing in a parking lot outside a facility.
Send me the First 72 Hours guide →
If you would rather just talk to a person, call the Prisoner Legal Aid Family Help Line at 786-408-5073, or text 727-635-0600. If it is the middle of the night, send the email instead and it will be read in the morning.
Prisoner Legal Aid prepares documents, requests records, explains deadlines, and connects families with independent civil rights attorneys, under the oversight of a licensed attorney. Nobody can tell you how this ends. What a second set of hands can do is help you write the letters that make a facility put in writing who examined him, when, and what they saw.